Today, while ironing his shirt on Fridays (because today is Friday, not having a single shirt to tooooodos on Friday), I heard the news that the mayor proposed Surquillo - or something - liberalization of the sale of marijuana and cocaine to addicts. I smiled incredulously that, as ever I read a news paper, this was the same mayor who wanted to ban the sale of alcohol in his district 24 hours a holy day. Or at least that I understood.
Now, my idea does not seem too bad actually.
That is, people who buy drug is you want to buy drugs. Say, if I fancied my purchase ... since the purchase. It's that simple. Then all the prohibitions and the rest is - as if you had not been - more. Now, why not buy? Well, I think that has more to do with a personal idea about that with the effectiveness of the bans. That is, and at least in my case, educating more effective than banning.
other hand, what if liberalize the sale of a drug and the legal beams through a special institution - any pharmacy would. Well I think that what happens is that there would be a large increase in consumers. Why? Because that it is clear that anyone who wants to buy these substances ... and buying. On the other hand, those who do not buy now, it is very unlikely to buy more machines that are in the street. Of course, this reasoning is too simplistic and may not be strictly true but just think that - despite bans - the sale of drugs is almost as free as if it were the other way. However
to that you can add another item and is ... to liberalize the sale of the substance by companies - companies should have - which is responsible for producing and packaging can generate, finally, a mechanism of control over the quality and origin of them. And above all, they crack the rim entirely to those who gain from cost overruns generated per se the "underground." Would something similar to what happened in the United States when they lifted the ban: the price of alcohol had an overall decline. That is, kill the black market and make it a highly profitable activity becomes an ordinary activity such as selling aspirin.
course it would be good right? If you kill the black market, would end the illicit drug traffic and sales activity, production and transfer would not be as attractive. But of course, also would end up with the big cities that are committed to combating against it. And I think here is where the subject and the main reason why we can not think of being Dutch as regards to the legalization of the sale of drugs.
But I do not ends up looking bad idea. On the contrary.
And I knew it was coming a poor mayor cargamontón surquillano against which it seemed a good idea just that: a good idea.
say, so to speak.
Now, my idea does not seem too bad actually.
That is, people who buy drug is you want to buy drugs. Say, if I fancied my purchase ... since the purchase. It's that simple. Then all the prohibitions and the rest is - as if you had not been - more. Now, why not buy? Well, I think that has more to do with a personal idea about that with the effectiveness of the bans. That is, and at least in my case, educating more effective than banning.
other hand, what if liberalize the sale of a drug and the legal beams through a special institution - any pharmacy would. Well I think that what happens is that there would be a large increase in consumers. Why? Because that it is clear that anyone who wants to buy these substances ... and buying. On the other hand, those who do not buy now, it is very unlikely to buy more machines that are in the street. Of course, this reasoning is too simplistic and may not be strictly true but just think that - despite bans - the sale of drugs is almost as free as if it were the other way. However
to that you can add another item and is ... to liberalize the sale of the substance by companies - companies should have - which is responsible for producing and packaging can generate, finally, a mechanism of control over the quality and origin of them. And above all, they crack the rim entirely to those who gain from cost overruns generated per se the "underground." Would something similar to what happened in the United States when they lifted the ban: the price of alcohol had an overall decline. That is, kill the black market and make it a highly profitable activity becomes an ordinary activity such as selling aspirin.
course it would be good right? If you kill the black market, would end the illicit drug traffic and sales activity, production and transfer would not be as attractive. But of course, also would end up with the big cities that are committed to combating against it. And I think here is where the subject and the main reason why we can not think of being Dutch as regards to the legalization of the sale of drugs.
But I do not ends up looking bad idea. On the contrary.
And I knew it was coming a poor mayor cargamontón surquillano against which it seemed a good idea just that: a good idea.
say, so to speak.
0 comments:
Post a Comment